"[T]he
same factors that make prior-act evidence probative—similarity and temporal
proximity—may also increase the risk of this form of unfair prejudice."
These are the wise words of the Sixth Circuit in United States v. Asher, a must-read case for understanding the push-me/pull-you nature of Rule 404(b) and Rule 403's probative/prejudice analysis. In Asher, the Sixth Circuit reversed the defendant's conviction on grounds that the district court erroneously admitted Rule 404(b) evidence. If you're moving to suppress evidence of a prior bad act, read Asher.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.